2
POPSThe Truth About Ron Paul: Delusional, Power-Hungry and Dangerous Jeffrey Lord offers the quintessential summary of Ron Paul for conservatives: The Ron Paul campaign is really about re-educating America to what can only be called Neoliberalism. Which, based on the evidence and writings of its supporters, appears to be a thin gruel of free markets and non-interventionism seasoned heavily with anti-Semitism, morally obtuse Neo-Confederates, and an outspoken contempt for both conservatism and conservative leaders past and present. Ron Paul and the Neoliberal Reeducation Campaign By Jeffrey Lord http://bit.ly/pxThk1 http://spectator.org by Doug Ross http://bit.ly/2oBjH2 http://directorblue.blogspot.com
7
POPSIt's official: White House defending violent, anti-semitic, 9/11 Truther, Marxist Mobs Unofficial confirmation that the White House is behind #OccupyWallStreet We already knew that the White House was using its bully pulpit to defend the violent, anti-semitic, 9/11 Truther, Marxist mobs on Wall Street and points west. Via Matt Drudge, we get a little bit more confirmation that the Community-Organizer-In-Chief seems content to align himself with Communists threatening violence against 'the rich', anarchists, Jew-haters, wealthy union bosses like Hoffa and Trumka, and cop-bashers. I regret to tell you this, but we're creeping ever closer to civil unrest. Which appears to be the president's aim. more Posted by Doug Ross http://directorblue.blogspot.com
5
POPS"Tea Party Envy" Careful what you wish for, liberals . . the Occupiers are mostly white, as Malcolm Sacks, "a New York activist who has been participating in the Zuccotti Park occupation," tells al-Jazeera: In general, the whole freak-out about the economic crisis, in the US at least, is kind of a response to the economic crisis finally hitting white people. . . . It finally feels like a crisis for the majority, including middle class and working class white folks, which is why we're seeing white people at the front, and taking over, these protests. . . . Meanwhile, at National Review Online Charles Cooke has video of an Occupier berating a Jewish man with anti-Semitic slurs. Cooke reports that "shortly after my video camera was switched off, (inexplicably) shouted the N-word at the same man." NRO's Jonah Goldberg notes that Michael Tomasky is the latest lefty journalist to sign on as a cheerleader for the Occupiers, then notes:
3
POPSJuly 4th Million Muslim Asslifters’ assault on Washington DC. ~ CANCELED ~ Rescheduled for March 2012.
It’s stated purpose was “post-911 healing.” Apart from propagating the truther nonsense, the march’s President is also a known Hamas operative. The initial plan was to have a counter-protest in Washington DC to confront them onsite and hold coordinated parrallel protests in the various state capitals in support. Then, back in April, the Muslim’s announced they had postponed their march until 2012.From the very beginning stages of planning the potential for a cancellation was brought up and it was decided that no matter the course of action taken by the Jihadists the counter-protests would still go on. Also, the Muslims have sworn to Allah they will be in DC next year. They have released the new promotional video already. And whether we just have to disregard permit regulations and stand up to the subversive Muslim terrorists outside “the regulations”, or raise whatever tyrannical fee is being demanded for use of our own land and property, the subversives will not be . . .
9
POPSLiberalism is a mental disorder Gee, just this week on Clipmarks debbyski, another deranged liberal, made a clip with the line "He can't handle the Truth' as a title! Coincidence? Keep alert and armed I'd say ;)
1
POPSGoodbye freedom in the U.S. of A. Video unveils quiet legislation to lock Americans up for life for protesting.
Quoted from video: "A new bill quietly introduced by Congress last week...the brainchild of Senators John McCain and Joe Leiberman.... "The frightening thing about this legislation is that it effectively gives the U.S. military the right to detain American citizens in the name of National Security, with absolutely no recourse to correct the situation if someone was, for example, detained in error. The bill is worded so broadly that it basically could throw you or I or anyone into jail for being perceived as the War on Terror, and it doesn't really set any limits on who makes the decision about that perception. And so if, say, we speak out very strongly against the government and it's somehow perceived as being a threat to the United States, we could see ourselves locked up, held by the military, interrogated, held indefinitely and all without a basic right to an attorney, a public trial, etc.... "Could we see this legislation used to stifle dissent... tea-partyers...9/11 trut
10
POPSAnti-Bush Truther shoots up Pentagon; Should we play the political blame game? article: "Those brave enough to troll leftist comments sections have noted mumblings therein that the guy was probably a secret “teabagger,” despite all evidence to the contrary." my comment: Sick. Another idiot. When will the violence end? I guess the Left is too focused on the senior citizens of the Tea Party with their polo shirts and sandals. I understand though, freedom scares the left, and old people who attend the Baptist church are worse than terrorists in their minds. And as always, EVERYONE is free to leave a comment here. I do not ban ANYONE, because unlike others, I do not attempt to suppress or deny the opinions of others. I don't promise to respond, but EVERYONE gets their say in my clips. I don't hate anyone. Everyone is entitled to their own opinions whether I like them or not.
10
POPSSen. Kirsten Gillibrand (D-N.Y.) Embraces Communist Van Jones For a time, Jones had been politically radioactive to Democrats but Gillibrand’s decision to work alongside him appears to bring Jones’s political exile to an end. Gillibrand, who had a reputation as a moderate Democrat before entering the U.S. Senate, has been steadily tacking to the left since being appointed to replace Secretary of State Hillary Clinton so it’s no surprise that she is cozying up to her party’s radical left-wing. Gillibrand was one of only seven senators who voted against de-funding the radical leftist group ACORN known for its decades of involvement in election fraud. At the time she defended her vote, telling the New York Post through a spokesperson, “The truth remains that thousands of New York families who are facing foreclosure depend on charitable organizations like ACORN for assistance.” “Van Jones is a globally recognized, award-winning pioneer in the green jobs movement. He also happens to be a super fun speaker so this will be a very ....
8
POPS Charles Krauthammer :: Fox Wars only disburses more than $3 trillion every year but is extending its reach ever deeper into private industry -- finance, autos, soon health care and energy. Think twice before you run an ad on Fox. At first, there was little reaction from other media. Then on Thursday, the administration tried to make them complicit in an actual boycott of Fox. The Treasury Department made available Ken Feinberg, the executive pay czar, for interviews with the White House "pool" news organizations -- except Fox. The other networks admirably refused, saying they would not interview Feinberg unless Fox was permitted to as well. The administration backed down. This was an important defeat because there's a principle at stake here. While government can and should debate and criticize opposition voices, the current White House goes beyond that. It wants to delegitimize any significant dissent. The objective is no secret.
2
POPSCongressman wants all 'czars' to testify I would think that these "czars" would want the opportunity to speak before congress. It would help them build support for their goals. If they don't speak before congress then we can presume that they either have something to hide or are misappropriating Federal funds. BY peterkuck on 09/09/2009 at 11:22
3
POPS Congressman Wants All 'Czars' To Testify by Jordan Fabian "His ability to slip into a position of power without due Congressional diligence only further underscores the necessity for a confirmation process," the third-term Republican said of Jones. However, the actual number of czars in the administration is a disputed matter. McHenry requests that all of President Obama's 44 czars testify before Congress. But other reports put the number at around 30. The North Carolina Republican did not provide a list of the 44 czars he wants to testify.
4
POPSOut: Commie Truther Green Jobs Czar. In: Union Hack “Manufacturing” Czar Bloom will continue to double-dip the government coffers as the Treasury Secretary’s car czar " oh, excuse me, “senior auto adviser.” Like so many of the Czars of the Obama Underworld, Bloom will serve in a completely superfluous position. Why does America need a “manufacturing” czar? Doesn’t the Department of Labor cover that jurisdiction already? No, Bloom has no actual, specialized experience in manufacturing. He does have a long track record of union hatchet jobs, though/ J.P. Freire and David Freddoso at the Examiner Commenter Gabriel Sutherland at Tom Maguire’s Just One Minute Read More >>> http://michellemalkin.com/
7
POPSEvidence of Abject Delusion The truther petition was the least of it all. You have the mind of a warped Hate-monger with no passion for the truth in Masbury. Driven by vitriolic division and party politics, blatantly lacking any moderation in his contempt for the decent.
10
POPSIs Obama’s “Czar System” Grounds For Impeachment? Was this what the Framers intended when they created the three branches of our government with all the checks and balances? I am no lawyer, and obviously not a Constitutional one, but it strikes me there is a problem here. And it could be very embarrassing to Mr. Obama. No doubt this is why, as Byron York points out, the mainstream media has been so reluctant to cover this story, only the WaPo and CBS chiming in at this point, although they were late to the party and relatively perfunctory. Had Bush appointed thirty-one czars outside the normal Congressional approval system the MSM would have been all over it like the proverbial wet suit, declaring a coup d’etat in the making. But, as of now, the MSM has imposed omerta. It is Labor Day weekend. We shall see what happens next week. UPDATE: Now that Van Jones has stepped, not surprisingly the NYT has commented " but without any acknowledgment that they had ignored the story. But what is interesting is that . . . .
4
POPSJust Call Him the Green Pitchfork Czar by Andy McCarthy (I'd wager, the very top) overrode any objections. The issue here isn't process. It's that Obama picked Van Jones because Obama adheres to Jones's Alinskyite views and tactics, and is entirely comfortable with what most of the public would see as the horrifying specter of Jones managing how billions of public dollars are spent. Mr. Jones’s involvement in the 1990s with a group called Standing Together to Organize a Revolutionary Movement prompted recent accusations by conservative critics that he associated with Communists. The group, according to a post-mortem written by some of its founders, was an anti-capitalist, antiwar organization committed to achieving “solidarity among all oppressed peoples” with “direct militant action.” Hold on there. Direct-action? The use of intimidation and extortion tactics, including law-breaking, to achieve political results? Where have we heard that before?
0
POPSVan Jones Round-up: MSM Reaffirming the "truth" Behind 911 on the Government's Behalf Conditioning at its finest. Better not look into 911 or you might be considered disturbing, radical, conspiratorial, a target of outrage, anti-American, wacky, crazy, repugnant, an extremist, alarming, and compared to the likes of clansmen and holocaust deniers. Anyone think such treatment of what the MSM thinks should be perceived as "delusion" a little curious? Maybe the ratings on that Nat Geo show were a little too high.
7
POPSThe Truth According To a Troofer: "America Had It Coming" Traveling through the Middle East about six months after 9/11, I was struck by the number of Arabs, from Egypt to the Gulf, who simultaneously believed (a) the Mossad were behind the attacks and (b) it was a great victory for the Muslim world. Van Jones would seem to be an American variant of the same phenomenon: a man who believes 9/11 was (a) blowback for the actions of the US government's war machine and (b) an inside job by the US government's war machine. No wonder the left derides those boorish enough to bring this stuff up: Why, surely all sophisticated persons know these positions are little more than lifestyle accessories or fashion hemlines. One season, everyone on the catwalk is agreed 9/11 was blowback by Jihadists for Social Justice. The next, everyone is equally agreed that Bush called up the White House Steel Melting Czar and buried the whole thing under "miscellaneous" in the budget. by Mark Steyn http://corner.nationalreview.com/
8
POPSOMG! Who's Going To Save Us From Global Warming Now? . . . . . really owes the White House an apology. This airbrushing was worthy of Stalin. Other NRO commenters at the link admire the assist the Politburo has gotten from the state-controlled media. The Moderate Voice : A case of poor vetting … Funny, that’s how I feel about the Obama administration, too. Aww, this is cute. Fellow-traveling Think Progress , wielding an airbrushlet: Racist right-wing conspiracy/hate campaign drives out smiling, well-intentioned, plucky environmental advocate. It’s an interesting presentation that makes no mention of you know what. Andrew Sullivan, to his credit, notices why Van was hounded out, but finds the gleefulness unseemly. Gutless wonder of a conspiracy theorist quits gutless wonder of a White House in the wee hours of Sunday morning, Labor Day weekend. Good work, Rahm. It’ll be out of the papers by Tuesday. Given that the Van Jones Truther scandal was barely covered in the first place, it’s like it never happened
5
POPSObama Admin Caught in Lie on Van Jones gee, why would they deny this when--as Bobby Rutan claims-'this is the opinion of MOST Americans" (hardly) Should they not proclaim his trutherism proudly, if indeed it is such an admirable position to hold ?
6
POPSStick A Fork in Mr. Van Jones… [updated] Oops. Now in complete fairness to Mr. Jones, I doubt that he was a died-in-the-wool 9/11 truther back in January 2002. Instead, I suspect he saw this march as an opportunity to attack, undermine, and de-legitimize the Bush Administration, and was happy to join in. However, he did so just four months after the worst attack on American soil in 60 years, and one that was a simultaneous attack on our financial, military, and political centers. My wife and I were living in DC itself on 9/11, just 4-5 miles due north of the Pentagon and roughly the same distance from the Mall (where United 93 would have crashed into either the White House or the US Capitol). I have no sympathy for Mr. Jones at all. I support his rights to freedom of speech and freedom of assembly, but he can’t distance himself from his choices and his timing. F. Webster over at And I Still Persist http://andstillipersist.com/2009/09/stick-a-fork-in-mr-van-jones/
3
Pops
Newest Clips
Latest Comments
Most Pops
Print
Save
Turn on live update