2
POPSIt ain't just hot air! Some hold-outs still argue that there's no such thing, but it's getting hard to deny. If I think about it long enough, I might be able to come up with some link to the raw diet as being a salve.
6
POPSNational Weather Agencies Acting as Trojan Horses For Maurice Strong And His IPCC Funnel For Funding No surprise that control was through funding of research, which was almost all through government. Canada is a good example of how they bypassed normal efforts to prevent political interference. Most scientific research funding goes through the National Research Council (NRC) or the National Scientific and Engineering Council (NSERC) to reduce political interference. However, virtually all climate research funding went through Environment Canada (EC). An article published on December 2, 2010 authored by Gordon McBean says, “This month, the Canadian Foundation for Climate and Atmospheric Sciences celebrated a birthday that could be among its last. After 10 years as Canada’s main funding agency for academic weather and climate science, the foundation will soon cease to exist if there’s no further support from the Canadian government.”
3
POPSPeer-to-Peer Review: ‘Climategate’, Part I ...continued This version of the graph included temperature reconstructions of three different groups of climate scientists, including Michael Mann, as well as Phil Jones and Keith Briffa, the latter two both from the University of East Anglia’s Climate Research Unit " the university where the Climategate files originated. This graph was even more compelling than the Mann et al (1999) hockey stick because it provided a graphical scientific consensus of man-induced global temperature increase. Now, the WMO’s 1999 report was not just any obscure scientific climate audit. The World Meteorological Organization is one of the founders of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) " the very body that is tasked with evaluating the risk of climate change caused by human activity.
5
POPSOpen Letter on Climate Legislation November 13, 2009 We feel that climate science is, in the current situation, too important to be kept under wraps. We hereby release a random selection of correspondence, code, and documents. Hopefully it will give some insight into the science and the people behind it. FOIA is the entity with the leaking data hacked from the UK research lab on November 17, 2009 FOIA is commenter #10 at noconsensus,com. http://tr.im/Fpmk
11
POPSGlobal Warming Exposed as 'Globaloney' via Big Hack Attack .... (presented out of order because of frequent updates at that post): Hackers have broken into the data base of the University of East Anglia’s Climatic Research Unit - one of the world’s leading alarmist centres - and put the files they stole on the Internet, on the grounds that the science is too important to be kept under wraps. he files suggest, on a very preliminary glance, some other very dubious practices, too, and a lot of collusion - sometimes called “peer review”. Or even conspiracy. (excerpt from a hacked e-mail) From: Phil Jones To: ray bradley ,mann@XXXX, mhughes@XXXX Subject: Diagram for WMO Statement Date: Tue, 16 Nov 1999 13:31:15 +0000 Cc: k.briffa@XXX.osborn@XXXX Continued below
0
POPSRecord emissions in 07 The United Nations' weather agency, the World Meteorological Organization (WMO) has announced that concentrations of greenhouse gases carbon dioxide, methane and nitrous oxide reached a new high last year.
2
POPSHuge Polar Study About To Begin Ahead of the IPY's launch, a team of researchers on the CAML project completed a 10-week census of marine life in a near-pristine strech of Antarctic seabed. "What we learned from the...expedition is the tip of an iceberg, so to speak," said team leader Michael Stoddart.